• Wednesday, February 28, 2024
businessday logo


Tribunal affirms PDP, Adedeji’s victory in Oyo

Tribunal affirms PDP, Adedeji’s victory in Oyo

The National and State Assembly Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Ibadan, Oyo State, on Wednesday, affirmed the victory and re-election of Olajide Adedeji Stanley of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) for the Ibadan South West/North West Federal Constituency of Oyo State.

In the judgment read by Justice Sobere Biambo, the chairman, which was unanimously adopted by the two other justices – Z.A. Zadat and Shaffau Lada Yusuff, the panel dismissed the petition filed by Akinade Saheed Fijabi of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Fijabi, a former House of Representatives member for the constituency, had filed the petition through his counsel Kazeem Gbadanosi, insisting that INEC did not organise election in three of the 713 polling units in the constituency. He also claimed that BVAS machines did not work there in the affected polling units, and that “the election was vitiated by mandatory non-compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act, 2022. He also raised an allegation of over-voting, adding that the conduct of the election was unlawful, undue, null and void”.

The broom party called five witnesses, including the candidate, Fijabi, and prayed the tribunal to deduct the results recorded for the three units from the totality of the ones declared, or rather nullify and cancel the entire election.

Read also: Banky W celebrates election Tribunal’s ruling for Eti-Osa constituency rerun

The INEC, Adedeji, and the PDP had contended that the petition be struck out or dismissed in its entirety with substantial cost as: “it is incompetent, gold-digging and frivolous. They claimed that there were no irregularities as alleged and that Adedeji won the election back to the House of Representatives.

The tribunal in the judgment found that Fijabi in his testimony said that all the information he heard concerning the election results was supplied to him by his party agents after he had voted in his Unit 58 of Ward 2, and left. He said he was not there when the result was declared.

The tribunal said it discovered that there were mutilations on some electoral materials tendered and there were no explanations; that there were irregular and suspicious alterations, illegible records in some documents tendered, that did not tally with the pleadings. They were accordingly discountenanced and rejected for not having probative value.

“None of the five witnesses frankly proved the allegations contained in their reliefs, and evidence given amounted to hearsay. PW5 did not know if the election was credible but that he left after voting. Those present or on the field are the ones who can talk or testify on the documents.

“On the allegation of over-voting, voters register, BVAS report must be presented, but the petitioners failed to prove this, the panel submitted.

The tribunal, therefore, held that the petitioners failed to substantially prove their case on merit, saying “It is hereby dismissed with a cost of N1m to each of the respondents”.