Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) has reportedly emailed recent recipients of Canadian citizenship certificates in the United States (US), informing them that their citizenship status is now under review, as they surrender their citizenship certificates for re-assessment.
The development comes as applicants under Canada’s expanded citizenship laws face renewed scrutiny, following the reassessment of previously approved citizenship applications.
Recent amendments to Canada’s Citizenship Act triggered a surge in applications for citizenship by descent, some of which are now being revisited by the federal government.
Many of the affected individuals had already received citizenship certificates. In some cases, they had also obtained Canadian passports and Social Insurance Numbers in preparation for relocation to Canada.
What the letters say
The correspondence references subsection 26(1) of the Citizenship Regulations, which allows the Registrar of Canadian Citizenship to request the return of a citizenship certificate if there are concerns about eligibility.
Officials clarified that this is not a formal revocation of citizenship, but a review process. However, it may lead to further action depending on the outcome.
Recipients were also informed that they may submit additional documentation to support their application. If entitlement is confirmed, the certificate will be returned.
Read also: Canada claim first World Cup point in draw with Bosnia
Why applications were flagged
IRCC identified two main issues prompting the reviews.
First, some applicants submitted documents that did not originate from official source authorities such as civil registries, vital statistics offices, or provincial archives responsible for maintaining original records.
Second, in cases where documents were unavailable, applicants failed to provide written explanations or evidence showing attempts to obtain them.
In practice, the concerns relate to whether applicants have sufficiently demonstrated an unbroken line of descent from a Canadian citizen using verifiable documentation.
In other words, applicants are not being questioned as non-Canadians, but as individuals who have not yet fully proven their eligibility under the required evidentiary standards.
Reports shared on immigration forums suggest that those affected tend to fall into several categories.
Some relied on genealogy platform records such as Ancestry or FamilySearch as primary evidence. Others submitted certified records sourced from archives rather than official vital statistics offices, raising questions about whether such documents meet IRCC standards.
In some cases, applicants were unable to locate records for ancestors born in earlier centuries but failed to formally document these gaps within their submissions.
Read also: Canada targets deeper ties as trade with Nigeria
What to do if you receive a letter
Individuals who receive a surrender or review letter are usually given the opportunity to respond with additional evidence.
IRCC typically outlines the specific concerns raised by officers, allowing applicants to address gaps directly.
Where certificates have already been issued in physical form, applicants are asked to return them during the review process. Electronic records may not require any action. However, no fixed timeline is provided, and reviews may take several months.
Applicants are advised to retain copies of all submitted documents.
At this stage, many applicants seek legal support to strengthen their case. Immigration lawyers familiar with citizenship by descent processes can help ensure that documentation meets IRCC requirements and that responses address specific gaps identified in the review.
Read also: Int’l students in Canada no longer need separate study study work permit
How to avoid common pitfalls
A key requirement in citizenship by descent applications is using documents from source authorities. These include civil registries, provincial or state vital records offices, or recognised archives that hold original documentation.
Records obtained from genealogy websites are not considered official sources, even if they reproduce original documents. They are treated as secondary references rather than authoritative records.
Applicants are generally expected to provide at least one official document for each generational link, such as birth or marriage certificates that clearly establish lineage. Missing documentation, particularly where name changes occur, can significantly weaken an application.
Certified copies issued by official authorities carry greater weight than uncertified scans, even if both contain the same information.
What if records do not exist?
IRCC guidelines acknowledge that some records may be unavailable, particularly for older generations.
In such cases, applicants are expected to include a written explanation outlining efforts made to obtain the documents.
Where an official search confirms that a record does not exist, authorities may issue a “letter of no record”. This can be submitted alongside alternative evidence to support the application.
IRCC may also issue its own “no record” confirmation where applicable.
Providing clear explanations alongside supporting evidence helps ensure that gaps in documentation do not automatically result in refusal.
Join BusinessDay whatsapp Channel, to stay up to date
Open In Whatsapp
