There was a furor in social media circles recently concerning a three-day trip to Egypt by Peter Obi, one of the men currently in the running to become President of Nigeria in 2023.
By the man’s pronouncement, he was going to Egypt to understudy the modalities by which the Egyptians were able to deal with the issues of power, education, planning and finance in a way that made them outliers on the African continent.
The value of the ‘Short Course’ for Nigerian executive types is well entrenched in corporate culture. The top learning institutions in the world – Insead and Harvard and London Business School make a substantial part of their income from ‘Short Executive Training Courses,’ which are attended by well-heeled bank managers and business executives from all over the world, especially Nigeria.
Understudying ‘Best Practice’ is a legitimate effective way of improving corporate performance. It may be truthfully said that no executive office in Nigeria, a country that is literally and metaphorically on life support and living on borrowed time, requires to be visited with a fresh dose of knowledge and performance capability than the office of the President, an office that is ultimately culpable for the country’s arrival at this sad pass.
Going back to Peter Obi, why Egypt? Afterall, Nigeria’s ‘rebased’ GDP is higher than Egypt’s. Unfortunately, such ‘patriotic’ chest beating cannot hide the fact that, in terms of clearly defining problems and moving intentionally to tackle them, Egypt is miles ahead of Nigeria
Nigerian leaders often do not discuss ideas, or feel the need to study them, create them, and try to make them work.
One unusual person in this regard, who seems to have understood the value of working from ideas, whether ‘borrowed’ or innovated, and who tried to lock them in for the succession is Babatunde Raji Fashola.
Just before the end of his tenure as governor of Lagos State, he caused to be published a set of 10 or so ‘Good Practice’ documents. Each one dealt with the ideas he had put in place in one key area of governance, from Health to the creation of an Agency for the waterways, to the EKO system in education. The publications were not just celebrating his ’achievements’ but pointed out where the succession could build on.
There is no evidence, unfortunately, that any of his successors have read BRF’s Good Practice series. Instead, his immediate successor took pleasure in ‘cancelling’ many of the things he had done – a very Nigerian story.
Going back to Peter Obi, why Egypt? Afterall, Nigeria’s ‘rebased’ GDP is higher than Egypt’s. Unfortunately, such ‘patriotic’ chest beating cannot hide the fact that, in terms of clearly defining problems and moving intentionally to tackle them, Egypt is miles ahead of Nigeria.
Several years ago, as a postgraduate student in the UK, this author undertook a whirlwind mini-world tour. In Cairo, you could see the construction work starting on the Cairo Metro. The strongman in Cairo at the time was President Hosni Mubarak.
Your next stop was home – Lagos, where it was gratifying to see, at Yaba, evidence of commencement of work on the Lagos Metro.
You went back to your station happy that someone in Nigeria was thinking right and building a spine for the mass transit of the ever-increasing population of Lagos.
Shortly after that it was in the news that the stern-faced military strongman who became Head of State after the military coup in Nigeria had ‘cancelled’ the Lagos metro, paying penalty for breach of contract equivalent to the amount it would have cost to complete the project.
Read also: NEPC targets 40% increase in non-oil export with new trade houses in Egypt, others
There have been vigorous efforts since then to rewrite history and rationalise the bizarre decision, vaguely citing ‘corruption’ or the recommendation of some shadowy ‘committee.’ The reality is that there was only one strongman in power in Nigeria, and he will be held accountable for one of the most atrocious public administration decisions in human history.
Incidentally, a ‘Federal Government’ delegation later travelled to Cairo to celebrate with Egyptians on the day Mubarak commissioned his Cairo metro.
It is the same strongman, in his civilian incarnation, that Peter Obi, with his tall dream, and the others who are lining up for the 2023 elections, are hoping to take over from. Nigeria is substantially more damaged now than ever before. The essence of the nation has been subverted, the National Question – ‘Who is a Nigerian?’ is ringing unanswered from every corner. People have lost trust in all national institutions.
It is from this nadir that the next President will have to find a way back for the country – if there is a way.
The current strongman of Egypt is a retired soldier who has jailed and killed his countrymen, especially members of the ‘Muslim Brotherhood,’ on an industrial scale, and shows a readiness to continue to do so. His purpose is to maintain ‘stability’ and a secular constitution.
But he is also a ‘development’ man who in six years has kept Egyptian economy growing, where other countries are sinking into recession. He has massively scaled up power generation and built spare capacity. He is building huge alternative energy resources.
He is building a new administrative capital. Life expectancy in Egypt is 70+ years, where it is 55 in Nigeria. Egypt’s literacy level is much higher than Nigeria’s. More than 50 percent of the population already have Health Insurance, and for the rest, the citizens pay 20 percent of the cost of medical treatment, while the government pays the rest.
There is a lot for Obi to study, and it is uncertain how much he has brought back from his journey. A 30-minute one-one-one with Abdel Fattah Saeed Hussein Khalil el-Sisi might have been more useful than hours trawling through power plants. The thinking is the real achievement; the doing is just implementation.
Of course, in El-Sisi’s Egypt, a minister or civil servant stealing money meant for a project might just ‘disappear.’
A lot of Egyptians hate El-Sisi, and many of Egypt’s best brains are in exile. The country’s ‘Democracy’ is a charade of periodic ‘landslide’ election victories.
Effective Governance in Africa, it seems, comes at a price, and sometimes that price is very high indeed.
