Badenoch urges UK government not to allow temporary work visa holders have permanent settlement 

Kemi Badenoch, leader of United Kingdom (UK) conservative party, has urged the Labour government not to allow temporary work visa holders exceed it’s original 10-year period.

According to her, the government needs to retain its proposed ten-year qualifying period insisting that temporary work visas should not automatically lead to permanent settlement in Britain.

She argued that extending the qualifying period to ten years would not amount to changing the rules retrospectively, stressing that temporary work visas do not confer an automatic right to permanent residence.

Read also: Explainer: DBS: How pension harmonisation could finally end decades of unequal retirement pay
Badenoch noted this in letter seen on her X handle, addressed to the UK’s Home Secretary, where she criticised efforts by some Labour lawmakers to dilute the government’s planned immigration reforms.

“People who come to Britain on temporary work visas should not automatically be able to stay forever,” she wrote.

“This Labour government was right to make that harder. Now their MPs want them to U-turn. Conservatives will back Labour’s original plan to help get it through Parliament.”

In the letter, jointly signed by Badenoch and Chris Philp, Shadow Home Secretary, the Conservatives warned against reports that the government was considering exempting around two million migrants who entered the UK on work visas between 2021 and the present from the proposed changes.

Describing the reported exemption as “a grave mistake,” Badenoch argued that Britain had previously experienced the consequences of allowing migrants to obtain permanent settlement too quickly.

“As Conservatives learned to our cost, five years is too short a time to obtain the indefinite right to remain in the UK,” the letter stated.

She further argued that many migrants currently employed in low-paid and low-skilled jobs could be replaced by economically inactive British citizens if more employment opportunities were created.

According to Badenoch, migrants who fail to make what she described as a significant economic contribution over a decade should return to their home countries once their temporary work visas expire.

“Individuals who are not making a significant economic contribution over a ten-year period should not be allowed to stay indefinitely. Those not working, or working in low-paid jobs, should be required to go home at the end of their temporary work visa,” she wrote.

Badenoch also maintained that granting indefinite leave to remain after just five years increases pressure on Britain’s welfare system because recipients become eligible for social benefits and can later apply for British citizenship.

“The government is perfectly entitled to decide at any time the rules on indefinite rights of settlement, including in relation to those here already,” she said.

Badenoch said the Conservative Party would back Labour’s original immigration proposals if they were introduced without dilution.

“If you table the proposals set out last autumn in undiluted form, either in the Immigration Rules or as part of the Immigration and Asylum Bill, we will support them,” the letter said.

She added that Labour’s handling of the reforms would demonstrate whether the party was genuinely committed to controlling immigration and strengthening the UK’s borders.