• Saturday, December 02, 2023
businessday logo


Hate speech bill to suffer setback in House of Reps

hate speech

The proposed ‘Hate Speech Bill’ currently before the Senate which, amongst others, stipulates death penalty for offenders, would suffer a setback in the House of Representatives when transmitted for concurrence.

Dachung Bagos, member representing  Jos South-Jos East Federal Constituency of Plateau State, gave this indication while briefing journalists after submitting a letter of a protest titled: ‘Rejection of the proposed legislation on hate speech protection from Internet falsehood and manipulation,’ from his constituents to the Senate.

Bagos, who lamented that the bill sought to breach the fundamental rights of Nigerians as guaranteed by the 1999 Constitution (as amended), said the bill would be dead on arrival in the House.

While stressing that half of pressmen would be in jail when the bill is passed into law as envisaged by its promoters, said Nigeria does not require such a draconian and tyrannical law in the 21st century, as there are existing laws that address such issue raised in the proposed bill.

“I humbly write in view of the above subject matter, having received series of complaints and objections via text messages, calls, emails, WhatsApp messages and direct contact with some of my Constituents who are aggrieved and had to express their concerns over the Hate Speech and Protection from Internet Falsehood and Manipulation Bills, currently undergoing passage into law by the Senate, the Federal Republic of Nigeria

“The views expressed by my Constituents, many Nigerian citizens and even foreign nationals who have reached me, all voiced out against the passage of the two Bills.

“The views so expressed align with my thoughts and position as the Honourable Member, Representing Jos South/Jos East Federal Constituency, Plateau State. More so that there are extant laws in our Jurisprudence and under the Law of Tort like the Defamation of Character, Libel and Slander, that address the concerns raised by the two Bills.

“Having sworn to an oath to defend the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (As Amended), I am herein guided and constrained to categorically and unequivocally state in strong terms, that I and my Constituents will not be a party to, nor grant consent to any proposed legislation that will compromise nor subvert the Fundamental Rights and Justiciable Rights of citizens as enshrined in Chapter VI of the Constitution of the Federal Republic Of Nigeria 1999 (As Amended) and in particular, Section 33 the right to life, also Section 39 (1) which guarantees the right to freedom of expression and the press which clearly states that: “every person shall be entitled to freedom of expression including freedom to hold opinions and to receive and import ideas and information without interference” and bearing in mind that the Constitution is the grand norm of Nigeria

“This approach is even more crocodile and draconian in nature seeing that death sentence has been advocated for as penalty in the Hate Speech Bill. Thus, to endorse these bills is tantamount to taking our dear nation back to the days of anarchy and tyranny that deprives citizens of the right to freedom of expression and the press thereby reaping the citizens from the right to dignity of human person as provided for in Section 34 (1) (a)(b) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic Of Nigeria 1999 (as amended)”, he affirmed.