• Sunday, May 05, 2024
businessday logo

BusinessDay

Between ponzi scheme and deposit insurance system

mmm-1-560×390

It was like the end of the world for Daniel Pam (not real name), 55, married with five children who recently received his exit package after a rationalisation exercise by his employer. The events in the penultimate week had hit him like a razor through the linen when the reality of his investment in the Mavrodi Mondial Money (MMM) Ponzi scheme dawned on him. In a jiffy, a thick cloud of gloom and despair set over his life forcing him to attempt suicide but was saved by the timely intervention of his vigilant neighbours. Daniel withdrew all his life savings, including his exit package from his bank and persuaded his wife to surrender the capital from her boutique business and invested all in the MMM. In an attempt to take maximum advantage of the 30 per cent per month reward offered by the scheme, Daniel also sold his “jalopy” car and added the proceeds to what he initially invested in the MMM. In all, he put in a total of N9 million into the scheme and was expecting a whooping return to the tune of N11.70 million on investment in the so called MMM.
Daniel’s apprehension began in December 2016 when the MMM promoters suspended payment to investors in Nigeria until January 13, 2017. The date came and the promise of payment resumption turned a mirage. Daniel, as he is often called by his wife fell into depression and hell was let lose all around him.
The experience of Blossom Darocha (not real name) 30, Youth Corps member serving in Abuja in the MMM was a story of hope turned illusion. As a forward looking young lady, Blossom had raised money back in October, 2016 to pay her rent by January 2017. She was however attracted by the 30 per cent reward offered by the MMM scheme with the hope of getting her money plus the reward by December 2016. The scheme was suspended and Blossom’s rent disappeared into the thin air. Initially, she was convinced that if the payment resumed in January, she would get her money back to pay her rent before the end of the month. However, by the time payment resumed, it was to investors with smaller amounts. Blossom, who is currently grappling to feed herself, was left in a state of despair having burnt her fingers in the MMM scheme.
The story is the same with most Nigerians who invested in the Ponzi scheme. Rashidi Shomefun (not real name), a resident of Ikorodu, Lagos argued that the reason why he invested his money in the scheme despite its high risks was because his money in the bank was equally at similar risks. He said that like other depositors he was often left alone to contend with the sharp practices perpetrated by banks. He further stated that, there would be no difference in the fate of MMM investors from that of bank depositors if the scheme crashed as many Nigerian banks had equally failed in the past. He inquired “Who will pay the depositors if their bank fails. Tell me?”
As cynical as Shomefun’s arguments might sound, they are also erroneous and far from the truth. Shomefun is truly unaware of the protection available to him and other bank depositors under the Nigeria Deposit Insurance System. The reality is that all bank depositors with exception of banks’ staff and directors enjoy protection on their bank deposits through the deposit guarantee system of the NDIC.
The advent of NDIC in the financial landscape since 1989 was to provide another layer of protection for bank depositors through the deposit insurance system (DIS). The government at the time had introduced the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) which led to the liberalisation of banking licences and sharp increase in the number of banks. The need then arose to put an institution in place to protect bank depositors from the likely effects of stiff competition among the banks that was envisaged in the aftermath of the deregulation of the economy. In addition, the economic liberalisation policy shifted the government’s attention from a blanket guarantee on the banking industry to that of protecting the depositors, especially the small and unsophisticated savers. The NDIC’s layer of protection for the bank depositors is provided through its core mandate namely deposit guarantee, bank supervision, failure resolution and bank liquidation.
The NDIC’s deposit guarantee involves reimbursement to bank customers in the event of failure or difficulty of payments by the financial institutions. The deposit insurance system guarantees payment to depositors up to a maximum limit as provided for in the NDIC Act in the event of failure of a banking institution. From a maximum limit of N50,000 per depositor per bank at its inception in 1989, the guaranteed sum had been reviewed upward to N500,000 per depositor per Deposit Money Bank (DMB) as well as N200,000 per depositor per Primary Mortgage Bank (PMB) and Microfinance Bank (MFB) to reflect economic realities. In 2016, with the growth in the deposit structure of PMBs, the maximum deposit insurance coverage was increased to N500,000 per depositor per PMB to further enhance public confidence in the sub-sector.
Following the advent of non-interest banking and mobile money, the Corporation swiftly developed frameworks for non interest deposit insurance to depositors of Non-Interest Banks (NIBs) and pass-through deposit insurance for subscribers of Mobile Money Operators (MMOs). Both depositors of NIBs and subscribers of MMOs are insured up to N500,000 per depositor/subscriber respectively.
It is imperative to note that the maximum deposit guarantee levels for all categories of banks cover over 95 per cent of the total depositors. The implication of this is that if any bank fails, over 95 per cent of its depositors will first receive their full deposit from the NDIC’s deposit insurance fund while the balance in excess of the insured sum is paid in form of liquidation dividend from the proceeds realised from disposal of physical assets and recovery of debts owed the failed bank.
Through bank supervision which is carried out in conjunction with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Corporation carries out effective bank supervision in order to reduce the potential risk of failure and ensure that unsafe and unsound banking practices do not go unchecked.
Under the distress resolution, the Corporation equally protects depositors’ funds through the steps taken to address any sign of distress in any bank to prevent it from failing. A case in point was the establishment of three (3) bridge banks in 2011 namely Mainstreet Bank Ltd. Keystone Bank Ltd and Enterprise Bank Ltd. The three (3) bridge banks assumed the assets and liabilities of the defunct Afribank Plc Bank PHB Plc and Spring Bank Plc respectively when it became obvious that the shareholders’ funds of the three (3) affected banks had been completely eroded.
The bridge bank mechanism recorded remarkable achievements as it sustained the daily operations of the three erstwhile banks and protected a total deposit liabilities of the banks amounting to N809 billion. The mechanism also enhanced depositors and other stakeholders’ confidence in the banking system by safeguarding a total of 6,667 jobs that would have been lost if outright liquidation option had been adopted.
With the extensive protection to depositors by the NDIC, it is obviously safer and wiser to save your money in licensed banking institutions than to gamble it through the so called investment in the Ponzi schemes that is currently reigning worldwide.