The entertainment industry is undergoing a seismic shift, driven by the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI). From AI-powered music playlists to fully generated scripts, technology is redefining how audiences consume content.
But as AI takes a more prominent role in entertainment, a critical question arises: Can it truly enhance creativity, or will it undermine the human touch that makes storytelling so powerful?
BusinessDay’s January 2025, Gen Z picks survey on motherhood and career progression reveals the struggles, sacrifices, and resilience of Nigerian working mothers.
A recent poll targeting Gen Z audiences sheds light on their perceptions of AI-generated content. The results reveal both excitement and scepticism about AI’s role in media. When asked if they would watch a Netflix series entirely created by AI, none of the respondents were fully convinced, though 57.1% said they might watch if the concept was interesting. However, 42.9% preferred human-created stories, emphasising the enduring value of human creativity.
When asked about the type of AI-generated content that excites them the most, responses were evenly split among interactive movies or series (28.6%), mood-adaptive music playlists (28.6%), and video games with AI-generated characters and worlds (28.6%). The remaining 14.3% were drawn to social media posts tailored to their interests. This data highlights the growing appeal of personalisation and interactivity in entertainment, indicating that AI-driven customisation could play a crucial role in media consumption habits.
Personalisation was further reinforced in another question that explored its importance in keeping audiences engaged with a media platform. A majority, 57.1%, deemed it essential, while 42.9% appreciated a blend of personalised and general content. No respondents dismissed personalisation outright, which signifies that media companies leveraging AI for tailored experiences have a strong chance of retaining users.
The poll also investigated whether people would attend a live concert where AI-generated visuals and music were the main attractions. Only 14.3% found this idea exciting, while 28.6% said they might consider it depending on the quality of the content. However, a significant 51.1% preferred human-led performances. This scepticism suggests that AI-generated experiences in the music industry may still need refinement before they can compete with live performances by human artists.
When it comes to AI-driven features that would keep users coming back to a media platform, personalised recommendations took the lead with 57.1%, followed by interactive or branching storylines at 28.6%. Interestingly, AI-generated playlists or exclusive content received no votes, while 14.3% preferred traditional media experiences. This finding suggests that while AI-driven personalisation is valuable, users may still expect a balance between AI-curated and human-curated content.
The financial viability of AI-generated content was explored with a question about whether users would pay for exclusive access to AI-created stories, music, or art. Only 14.3% expressed a definite willingness to pay, while 71.4% said they might, depending on the quality of the content. Meanwhile, 14.3% were not willing to pay at all. This result implies that AI-generated content must demonstrate clear value before consumers are willing to spend money on it, reinforcing the idea that AI in entertainment must reach a higher standard of quality and engagement.
Curiosity about AI’s role in entertainment also revealed interesting perspectives. The highest percentage (42.9%) of respondents wanted to know if AI could create deeper emotional connections in games or films, while 28.6% were curious whether AI could tell better stories than humans. Only 14.3% wondered if AI would replace human creativity entirely, and another 14.3% were uninterested in AI’s impact on entertainment. This suggests that audiences are more intrigued by AI’s potential to enhance storytelling rather than replace traditional creators.
Trust in AI’s ability to create factually accurate and unbiased documentaries was another divisive topic. No respondents fully trusted AI for this task, while 71.4% were open to the idea but emphasised the importance of data verification. Meanwhile, 28.6% trusted humans more for documentary content. This highlights an ongoing concern about bias in AI-generated content and the necessity for transparent verification processes in AI-driven media.
On the question of whether AI-generated content will ever feel as emotionally authentic as human-created work, 42.9% believed that with the right advancements, it was possible. Another 28.6% thought it might take a long time, while an equal percentage believed AI lacked the emotional depth of humans.
Join BusinessDay whatsapp Channel, to stay up to date
Open In Whatsapp
