The ongoing protests against economic hardship and bad governance have gripped Nigeria with unprecedented fervour. Initially sparked by activists from the northern regions, the movement has rapidly gained nationwide momentum, revealing deep-seated frustrations among Nigerians. Unfortunately, the government’s response has been marked by high-octane rhetoric and an uncompromising stance, which only served to ignite dormant protest groups across the country.
Read also: Karu LG enforces 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew amid protests
To effectively manage future public unrest, a clear and unified government communication strategy is paramount. A single, authoritative voice, such as the Minister of Information, should be designated to address the public on sensitive matters. This centralised approach avoids the confusion and distrust generated by conflicting messages from multiple government officials. By acknowledging the public’s right to peaceful protest and demonstrating empathy, the government can mitigate tensions and avoid appearing unresponsive or authoritarian. As demonstrated by the recent unrest, a timely and direct presidential address could significantly de-escalate situations and foster public confidence.
The professionalism displayed by the Nigerian Police in many parts of the country, especially in Lagos and the South West, is commendable. However, the tragic loss of 13 lives on the first day of the protests in Suleja, Kaduna, and Maiduguri, as reported by Amnesty International, is deeply concerning. The deaths, attributed to security forces, are a stark reminder of the need for a non-lethal approach to managing public protests. It is unacceptable for security agencies to use assault rifles against unarmed citizens. Moving forward, the government must adopt the practices of developed countries, where non-lethal methods are employed to manage peaceful protests.
“By acknowledging the public’s right to peaceful protest and demonstrating empathy, the government can mitigate tensions and avoid appearing unresponsive or authoritarian.”
The involvement of Northern youths in these protests marks a significant departure from the past, where such activism was predominantly seen in the South. This shift is driven by the severe socio-economic conditions in the North, highlighting the widespread nature of the grievances. While violent riots are condemnable, the government must recognise the legitimate frustrations of the protesters and respond with empathy and constructive dialogue.
Nigerians deserve transparency regarding the leadership of the Take It Back Movement. It is essential to know if the movement is registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission, its organisational capacity, and the rationale behind extending the protests over ten days. Such transparency is crucial to ensuring accountability and legitimacy. Moreover, it is improper for legal representatives to front for protest groups. The leadership of the Take It Back Movement must publicly engage with the police and the government, giving a face to their cause.
The methods employed by the Take It Back Movement fall short of the principles of nonviolent mass action as espoused by Martin Luther King Jr. The movement must exhaust all avenues for peaceful resolution and ensure that their actions do not harm others. Transparency and accountability are paramount for any group advocating against bad governance.
Read also: International airlines operations ongoing amid protests
The economic cost of a prolonged protest is staggering, running into trillions of naira. This extended period of unrest disrupts the freedom of movement, businesses, and livelihoods, ultimately harming the economy. While the grievances of the protesters are valid, a ten-day protest is unnecessary and reckless. The point has been made; further action should focus on constructive dialogue and solutions.
In conclusion, while Nigerians have the right to protest against economic hardship and bad governance, it is imperative to do so responsibly and peacefully. Protests are a vital tool for democratic expression, but they must be conducted in a manner that respects the rights of others and upholds the law. The government, in turn, must demonstrate a genuine commitment to dialogue and compromise. By listening attentively to the concerns of the people, the government can foster a climate of trust and cooperation.
It is essential to recognise that both the government and the protesters share a common goal: a better Nigeria. To achieve this shared vision, it is imperative to engage in constructive dialogue and find common ground.
Violence and destruction only serve to heighten tensions and hinder progress. By working together and prioritising the welfare of the nation, Nigeria can overcome its challenges and build a brighter future for all its citizens.
