If conferences had a stock market, AI would currently be trading at an all-time high.

AI is now the headline, the keynote, the promise and, increasingly, the anxiety at every event brochure, every executive summit, every leadership retreat, every panel discussion and every business conversation.

It almost feels as though organisations are no longer competing for market share but competing for proximity to the future – each trying to appear more intelligent, more automated and more AI-ready than the next.

Sometimes, it feels less like a conversation and more like a competition –  a quiet battle of AI.

Recently, I attended a conference where a speaker made a bold prediction. Communications and media, he argued, would eventually be taken over by AI.

His evidence sounded convincing.

AI can design graphics and generate videos, write speeches, articles, press releases and communication materials.

The room nodded and I smiled.

Read also: The future of work; how personal branding drives career success 

Not because I disagreed with the capability of AI. AI is extraordinary ofcourse but because I questioned the conclusion.

Since when did producing communication become the same thing as communication?

We have confused outputs with outcomes.

The greatest threat to communications is not Artificial Intelligence. It is reducing communication to content.

Communication was never merely the act of creating content but communication is influence, context, trust, perception, timing and culture.

Communication is knowing what to say, what not to say, when to speak, when silence communicates more powerfully than words and how to move people from information to belief and belief into action.

AI can generate a press release but can it rebuild employee trust after organisational betrayal?

AI can design a campaign but can it read the silence in a room after a difficult announcement?

AI can produce a speech but can it carry conviction when the room no longer believes?

Technology has always automated tasks but what it has never fully automated is meaning.

This is why the future of work conversation may be focusing on the wrong battlefield.

Read also: AI, remote collaboration reshapes Nigeria’s workplace

The biggest threat AI poses to communications is not replacement. It is making us forget what communication actually is.

According to global workplace findings from Gallup, employee engagement remains one of the greatest productivity challenges facing organisations worldwide. Engagement is rarely destroyed by technology. More often, it deteriorates through unclear expectations, poor leadership communication and disconnection from purpose.

Similarly, organisations continue investing billions in digital transformation, yet many transformation efforts underperform – not because the technology failed, but because people were not brought along.

And bringing people along is communication.

The irony of the AI era is that as machines become more capable, human communication becomes more valuable.

Information is becoming abundant and Meaning is becoming scarce.

In a world where everyone can generate content, the differentiator will not be who speaks more. It will be who helps people understand.

The communications professionals who will thrive will not compete with AI to write faster, design quicker or publish more. Rather, the communications professionals who will thrive will become translators of complexity, architects of trust, curators of meaning and strategists of human connection.

Perhaps the future of work is not human versus machine after all.

Perhaps it is humans using machines to communicate with greater clarity, greater intelligence and greater purpose.

Because the organisations that will win tomorrow may not be those with the most advanced algorithms.

They may simply be the ones that explain change better.

And when the prompts end, the dashboards refresh and the next technological revolution arrives, one question will still determine who succeeds:

Can people understand, trust, move one another?

That is not an AI question.

That is a communication question.

And if AI replaces your communications function, perhaps the function had already stopped communicating long before AI arrived.

Esther Adeyanju is the head of Corporate Communications at the Chartered Institute of Personnel Management of Nigeria (CIPM).

Ngozi Ekugo is a Senior Correspondent at BusinessDay. She holds a Masters in management from the University of Lagos, an undergraduate from University of Lagos, and is in an alumni of Queen's College. Shes currently an associate member of the Chartered Institute of Personnel Management (CIPM). She has a brief experience at Goldman sachs, London in its Human Capital Management division. She is interested in human capital development and is leveraging her varied experience across sectors to report labour and global mobility trends for stakeholders to make informed decisions.

Join BusinessDay whatsapp Channel, to stay up to date

Open In Whatsapp