• Thursday, February 29, 2024
businessday logo


Cost of living crisis and neoliberalism in West Africa

Purchasing power in the Sahel region has stagnated over the past decade being strongly linked to the rising cost of living. In 2013, the average GDP per capita in West Africa stood at $1,905. Fast forward to 2022 we can see a GDP per capita of $1,690, indicating very negative growth regionally. This trend correlates with an uptick of inflation in various Sahel countries, as well as a surge in violence by bandits and jihadist groups.

To comprehensively analyse the reasons for these setbacks we must revisit the various themes found in all of these governmental styles. In the Sahel, we can analyse a more relaxed neoliberal style of governance as commonplace and as a de facto way of governance for most states. Alongside this we can see that generally these states share the same trade positionality, as poor free market states with large trade deficits and we can also see a decline in investment in the latter years of the decade.

The African continent due to underdevelopment, is pushed to the periphery of the world economy. The continued deficits are haunted by the ghost of free trade


Neoliberalism, as aptly defined by David Harvey is a “theory of political economic practices that proposes that human well-being can best be advanced by liberating individual entrepreneurial freedoms and skills within an institutional framework characterized by strong private property rights, free markets and free trade.”

As argued by him neoliberal frameworks at minimum set up military, defence and legal structures that defend private property and allow at its most basic for the market to function. It helps create markets where they are not present (for example a for profit health care system versus a single payer one). State intervention in the economy is discouraged as the state is seen as a statist villain. Neoliberals argue that whatever the state can do, the market can do better. This has been a common vision of economic thinking since the election of Thatcher in Britain and practiced in countries such as Chile under Pinochet. Deregulation and Privatization have been lauded in African think tanks as a prerequisite for development when we can see the negatives of state agencies and the cost of living.

Read also: Households’ cost of living surges in Tinubu’s 100 days

Africa itself transitioned into these types of economic models after the oil crisis of the 1980s. While neoliberalism is a typical West African economic orientation, this was modelled first with Sadat’s reforms. Egypt, which had emphasized previously a developmental model of import substitution industrialization, undertook the gradual privatization of hundreds of public enterprises known today as Infitah. This greatly exasperated the inequities between rich and poor Egyptians and these indigenous enterprises could not generally compete causing mass unemployment and the slashing of wages. This was directly linked to the cost of living crisis and the promised aid and assistance dried up creating a poor class of people that could not afford the amenities that were promised with economic liberalization. Many countries suffering from balance of payment problems found themselves in this conundrum and ultimately took to becoming much poorer due to the end of protectionism protecting their emerging industries.

Many African nations took these measures with the belief that public sector and governmental corruption would be offset by having a strong private sector that would avoid corruption and be profitable. But in most cases this was a free for all, the people that were able to buy these enterprises were people from the government and the very rich. These private enterprises lost even more oversight and due to their institutional ties and wealth they are able to lobby in a way that makes corruption even worse for the government to tackle.

Despite declining GDP and living standards, there has been little correction in the face of economic crises in these African nations. These countries are encouraged to privatize their public enterprises, resulting in the displacement of thousands from public sector jobs. Subsidies, designed to assist the working class in affording essentials like fuel and consumer goods, are being reduced, leaving millions with diminished purchasing power. IMF conditionalities often hinder countries from using loans productively; instead, they are used as temporary fixes for perpetual budget shortfalls. For instance, in Ghana, which is grappling with soaring inflation and a cost of living crisis, the IMF required a freeze on public sector eagles and hiring in exchange for loans, leading to layoffs and heightened poverty among these workers.

The current strategy of these governments, which prioritize expanding market mechanisms at the expense of workers, has proven to be unsuccessful and fails to generate the level of growth required to become a rapidly developing economy.

Retreat in investment

There has been a net decline in investment in Africa which has negatively impacted the economies of the Sahel. In general, more money flows outside of Africa than into Africa. Negative regional growth lowers the possibility of investment. In a lot of cases the concept of labour power is stressed where it is seen that Africa having a large population of manual laborers could attract investment the way that China did in the 1970s.

The main issue with this assessment is that capital invests primarily in sectors where the profit rate is much higher, meaning that is more likely to invest in richer, more educated sectors of the world. In 2022, Africa only made up 45 billion of FDI compared to 1.295 trillion of total investment around the world, less than 3% of total FDI. Capitalists prefer high wage countries where there is high purchasing power to afford products. With the developed world primarily in crisis, the demand for the products of African countries will decrease. FDI is a niche that only some rapidly developing countries can depend on but they are the exceptions. It is near impossible to facilitate growth from “comparative advantage.” from labour investment.

In China and the Asian tigers investment primarily came from Cold War political contexts, a lot of them focused heavily on obtaining an educated population. In China, this was facilitated through tech transfers and an industrial base originating from its communist political history. Viewing these specific conditions as being able to be copied is obscene when comparing two different specific models of investment. Developed industries even if their rentier (like a majority of Third World Resource development) attract investment not just “ease of trade.”

Read also: Nigerians rely on sport betting, loans as cost of living rises

Trade positionality

The African continent due to underdevelopment, is pushed to the periphery of the world economy. The continued deficits are haunted by the ghost of free trade. For years many have argued that Africa should use its position as a resource rich and cheap labour to utilize its “comparative advantage” and invest in any relevant sectors. The argument by free traders began with Portugal and UK (which ended up with mass unemployment in Portuguese industries and the deficits were only co-operated with colonial plunder) and now is being applied to the African continent.

What free-traders fail to see is that the theory of free trade does not co-equally benefit both partners in a free trade agreement. The countries that benefited the most from free trade have had cycles of protectionism growing its industries allowing it to outcompete, outproduce and oversaturate market share in comparison to the poor countries specializations. It is very difficult to grow via export-led development as historically the era of free trade (1980s onward) has been marked by reduced terms of trade and poverty between Africa and the Developed world.

Overall, high wage countries have more productive techniques and therefore more of an advantage, huge economic blocs like the EU can prevent countries from exporting what they would like by limiting imports. African countries don’t have the finesse to prevent this; exporting to the west at negative terms of trade is better than having fewer markets to export too (which would cause even more unemployment and deficit issues). When free traders point to a global reduction in poverty, this can only be seen with China’s heterodox political model, poverty in Africa has not reduced significantly with this political model.


The Sahel has faced significant economic issues over the past decade, leading to stagnation in purchasing power and declining living standards. The link is undeniable. The average per capita GDP in West Africa has declined showing negative prospects for future growth under this mode. West Africa’s economic challenges should be based on a rejection of this current economic model, better investment practices and trade practices that show finesse and understanding of Africa’s current role in the world economy. The way to fight underdevelopment in West Africa should be based in a departure from the status quo and a commitment to addressing the average West African workers’ concerns.