Two recent elections in the Caribbean region offered an unexpected but important lesson for Nigeria: in global politics, it is sovereignty, not population, that determines formal influence. And this fact has profound implications for Nigeria’s foreign policy, especially as President Bola Tinubu seeks to expand the country’s global profile and leverage recent diplomatic engagements with the Caribbean.
In Saint Lucia’s 2025 election, Prime Minister Phillip J. Pierre and the Saint Lucia Labour Party won a dominant mandate, claiming 14 of 17 parliamentary seats and securing roughly 49,000 votes out of 88,000 cast. In one constituency, Pierre received just 4,000 votes — yet this was enough to return him as head of government of a sovereign state.
In neighbouring Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, the New Democratic Party secured a similar landslide, winning 14 out of 15 seats on the basis of just 37,000 votes. Godwin Friday became Prime Minister with fewer votes than a single competitive polling unit in Lagos.
These numbers are striking not because the elections were illegitimate — they were not — but because they illustrate something seldom appreciated in Nigeria: very small electorates produce sovereign leaders who possess exactly the same formal status as the heads of the world’s most populous and powerful nations.
President Tinubu received 8.8 million votes in Nigeria’s 2023 presidential election. Donald Trump received roughly 77 million votes in the 2024 U.S. election. India’s Narendra Modi secured over 230 million votes across the most recent general election cycle. Yet in the United Nations General Assembly, all three leaders have exactly the same power as the prime ministers of Saint Lucia or Saint Vincent: one sovereign vote. One voice. One seat at the table.
This equality is not symbolic. It is structural. The global system—from the United Nations General Assembly to the Commonwealth, the African Union–CARICOM dialogues, and even FIFA and the International Olympic Committee—is built around sovereign parity, not demographic heft. That means that microstates can possess macro-influence if they act in coordinated and strategic ways.
For the Caribbean, this is not a theoretical insight but a longstanding diplomatic practice. The region comprises 16 sovereign states – 12 of them part of the Commonwealth, most with populations below 500,000. Yet collectively, through organisations such as CARICOM, the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States, and shared coordination in climate and trade negotiations, these small countries often act as a coherent voting bloc. They exchange information, align positions, and negotiate with the confidence of nations far larger.
For Nigeria, a continental heavyweight that often imagines global leadership in terms of economic size, population, or military capacity, this reality represents both a challenge and an opportunity. In multilateral forums, Nigeria’s moral weight does not translate into structural power unless it is paired with coalitions of countries willing to stand alongside it. Nigeria’s single sovereign vote is equal to Belize’s, Guyana’s, or Antigua and Barbuda’s. But those countries, in turn, could represent twelve votes, if coordinated, each equal to Nigeria’s own.
This is where recent diplomatic gestures begin to take on strategic significance. President Tinubu’s summer 2025 visit to Saint Lucia generated curiosity at home and modest international coverage, but it did not immediately register as a major geopolitical moment. Yet if Nigeria were to build sustained, mutually beneficial relationships with Caribbean states, cultural, economic, and political, it could significantly expand its influence not only within Africa but also on the global stage.
China, the United States, and the European Union have understood the importance of Caribbean diplomacy for decades. They invest heavily in microstates not because of their markets, but because of their votes. Nigeria, by contrast, has historically overlooked the region, despite deep historical and cultural linkages rooted in transatlantic history and shared postcolonial identities.
This can change — and Tinubu’s visit, if properly leveraged, could form the basis of a strategic realignment.
Nigeria has abundant human capital, institutional experience, and private-sector capacity that Caribbean states desperately need — in education, healthcare, agriculture, entertainment, and digital innovation. Meanwhile, Caribbean states possess political capital and institutional legitimacy that Nigeria could benefit from — in multilateral diplomacy, climate negotiations, global governance reform, and trade agreements.
The strategic formula is simple:
Nigeria has people; the Caribbean has votes.
Nigeria has scale; the Caribbean has access.
Nigeria has ambition; the Caribbean has leverage.
Together, they could form a coalition capable of reshaping conversations about migration, development finance, and global economic reform — and, crucially, advancing African priorities within international systems that currently marginalise the continent.
This is not unrealistic. Caribbean states are already experimenting with transnational labour mobility programmes with African countries. They are seeking skilled workers, teachers, nurses, IT professionals, and agricultural experts. Nigeria, with one of the world’s youngest and fastest-growing labour forces, is an ideal partner—if it designs bilateral agreements grounded in training, certification, and mutual benefit.
But diplomacy must move beyond ceremonial symbolism. Nigeria cannot afford a foreign policy that treats engagement with small states as a courtesy. It must treat them as partners with disproportionate influence. Alliances must be institutional, not episodic — built around frameworks, agreements, and concrete deliverables.
Because in a world where legitimacy is conferred through sovereign equality, aggregating small states into a diplomatic coalition may be the most effective, cost-efficient way for Nigeria to expand its soft power and global leadership.
Saint Lucia’s election, with its 49,000 votes for the national victory, and Saint Vincent’s, with its 37,000, are not curiosities from distant islands. They are reminders of a fundamental truth: small states matter enormously in global politics, and great powers ignore them at their own cost.
Nigeria’s challenge is not to dominate the international system but to organise allies within it. And its opportunity is not only in Africa but across the Atlantic — among countries whose votes weigh exactly the same as its own and whose histories are intertwined with its own.
If Tinubu’s Caribbean outreach becomes a sustained diplomatic strategy rather than a momentary photo op, Nigeria could unlock not just goodwill but real geopolitical leverage — and finally begin to turn demographic potential into diplomatic power and economic opportunity.
Dr Wiebe Boer, Chief Growth Officer, the JIPA Network & Editorial Advisory Board Member, BusinessDay
Join BusinessDay whatsapp Channel, to stay up to date
Open In Whatsapp
