Australia has backtracked on its earlier decision to exempt YouTube from its world-first social media ban for children under 16, setting the stage for a showdown with tech giant Google just months before the sweeping rules come into effect.
The legislation billed by the Albanese government as a “world-leading” intervention will prevent children under the age of 16 from holding accounts on social media platforms including TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, X , Snapchat and, following Wednesday’s announcement, YouTube. The ban, due to take effect in December, places the legal responsibility squarely on platforms to enforce the new age restrictions or face penalties of up to A$50 million (US$32.5 million).
Read also: Australia, Nigeria deepen mining ties with research, capacity enhancement programme
YouTube users under 16 will still be allowed to watch videos without logging in, but will no longer be able to upload content, comment or interact—features that require an account.
A political and legal fault line
The abrupt reversal comes after months of lobbying by YouTube, owned by Google’s parent company Alphabet, which had argued that it is not a traditional social media platform and provides educational and creative value to young Australians. A company spokesperson expressed disappointment at the decision, accusing the government of reversing a “clear, public commitment” to treat YouTube differently.
Reports in Australian media last week suggested Google had considered legal action if YouTube were added to the ban. On Wednesday, the platform said only that it would “consider next steps” and continue engagement with the government. It did not confirm or deny any legal threats.
Read also: What international students should expect when studying in Australia
Notably, the ban will not apply to YouTube Kids, a separate platform designed for under-13s that does not allow user uploads or comments.
Behind the reversal
Anika Wells, Communications Minister defended the government’s decision, citing a recent national survey by the independent eSafety Commission which found that YouTube was the most frequently mentioned platform where children aged 10 to 15 encountered harmful content. That content included misogynistic or hateful messaging, dangerous online challenges, and videos promoting disordered eating or extreme fitness behaviours.
“YouTube uses the same persuasive design features as other social media platforms,” Wells told Parliament. “Infinite scroll, autoplay, algorithmic feeds—our kids don’t stand a chance. That is why I accepted the eSafety recommendation that YouTube should not be treated differently.”
Read also: Australia-Nigeria alumni call for gender equality, stronger trade ties, local empowerment
Wells dismissed suggestions that the government was overreaching or caving to public pressure, invoking a powerful analogy: “It is like trying to teach your kids to swim in the open ocean, with rips and sharks, compared to the local council pool. We can’t control the ocean, but we can police the sharks.”
Join BusinessDay whatsapp Channel, to stay up to date
Open In Whatsapp
