The recent Premium Pension arbitration may come to be remembered not merely as a boardroom dispute, but as a moment when Nigeria’s private governance architecture was forced to confront a question it has long preferred to treat as ceremonial: can institutions entrusted with public wealth be governed by people whose political proximity creates a continuing integrity risk? On the surface, the matter appears narrow. A tribunal reportedly ordered the removal of four directors of Premium Pension Limited after holding that they qualified as politi
The recent Premium Pension arbitration may come to be remembered not merely as a boardroom dispute, but as a moment when Nigeria’s private governance architecture was forced to confront a question it has long preferred to treat as ceremonial: can institutions entrusted with public wealth be governed by people whose political proximity creates a continuing integrity risk? On the surface, the matter appears narrow. A tribunal reportedly ordered the removal of four directors of Premium Pension Limited after holding that they qualified as politi