There comes a point in the life of every political actor when ambition must submit to realism, and legacy must take precedence over personal desire. Nigeria appears to be approaching such a moment with Atiku Abubakar. While his right to aspire remains unquestionable in a democratic setting, the more important question confronting the nation today is not whether Atiku can contest again, but whether he can credibly win and govern in 2027. A sober, dispassionate assessment of Nigeria’s political mood, demographic realities, and historical memory suggests that Atiku Abubakar, at this point in time, is largely unelectable as president of Nigeria.
There is a delicate but unavoidable conversation Nigeria must have with Atiku Abubakar, one that goes beyond sentiment, personal loyalty, or nostalgia for past political contests. It is a conversation rooted in political reality, voter psychology, generational change, and the hard arithmetic of electoral acceptability. Atiku Abubakar has paid his dues in Nigerian politics, but paying dues is not the same thing as being electable. As Nigeria approaches the 2027 election cycle, the evidence increasingly suggests that Atiku is not just struggling against opponents but against history, perception, and time itself.
Atiku’s ambition to become president is one of the longest-running in Nigeria’s democratic experience. It has spanned military-to-civilian transition politics, multiple administrations, and several ideological cycles. While perseverance can be admirable, ambition that refuses to recalibrate often turns into political self-indulgence. For a large segment of Nigerians, especially younger voters who now constitute the dominant voting bloc, Atiku’s repeated bids no longer signal determination; they signal an inability to let go. Nigeria today is not merely looking for experience; it is looking for renewal. Atiku’s ambition, however consistent, is now widely seen as out of sync with the national mood.
This disconnect is worsened by his extraordinary inconsistency in party affiliation. Atiku’s political journey reads less like principled evolution and more like opportunistic migration. He rose to national prominence within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), served as vice president on its platform, later defected to the Action Congress (AC), returned to the PDP, defected again to the All Progressives Congress (APC) in 2014, contested and lost the APC presidential primaries, and then returned once more to the PDP to fly its presidential flag in 2019 and 2023. This repeated movement across parties has left many Nigerians unconvinced that Atiku stands for anything beyond his personal quest for power. In an era where voters increasingly scrutinise values, ideology, and consistency, this record severely undermines trust.
Atiku is also weighed down by the heavy baggage of the old political order. He is widely perceived as part of a generation of elites who have dominated Nigeria’s power structure since the early years of the Fourth Republic, a generation many Nigerians blame for entrenching corruption, weakening institutions, and normalising elite impunity. Whether entirely fair or not, perception is political reality. Atiku does not represent disruption; he represents continuity. In a country battling economic distress, youth unemployment, insecurity, and institutional decay, continuity is not an attractive campaign message.
His political influence in the North, once his strongest pillar, has noticeably declined. Northern politics has evolved beyond personality dominance. New actors, shifting regional interests, and changing voter expectations have diluted Atiku’s once-formidable grip. The North is no longer inclined to rally behind a single candidate out of habit or sentiment. Without overwhelming northern consolidation, Atiku’s pathway to national victory becomes extremely narrow, if not mathematically implausible.
Equally significant is the unresolved national sensitivity around the informal North–South power rotation arrangement. After eight years of northern presidency, there is a strong expectation across much of the country, particularly in the South, that power should not immediately return northward. According to a leading politician from Kaduna State, former Senator Shehu Sani, during an interview on TVC News on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, “It is morally unacceptable for any northerner to pursue an election in 2027.” Atiku’s renewed ambition for 2027 cuts directly against this sentiment. For many southerners, his candidacy reopens old wounds, especially given his historical posture during debates about the Southern presidency, where he was perceived as comfortable with limiting the South to a single term. That history has not been forgotten, and it will shape how his ambition is received.
Then there is the enduring cloud of corruption allegations that has followed Atiku for decades, most notably those linked to privatisation exercises during his tenure as vice president. While he has consistently denied wrongdoing and points to the absence of a criminal conviction, Nigerian politics does not operate on legal technicalities alone. Public trust is shaped by unresolved questions, not courtroom verdicts. These allegations, combined with others that have surfaced over the years, remain a persistent liability. They are further reinforced by the public and often damning remarks of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, under whom Atiku served. Obasanjo’s repeated expressions of doubt about Atiku’s suitability for the presidency have had a profound influence on elite opinion and voter perception alike.
Atiku’s political camp also presents a serious credibility problem. Many of his most visible supporters are perceived as political rent-seekers driven by entitlement and settlement expectations rather than national reform. Nigerians, having endured years of elite excess and transactional politics, are deeply suspicious of leadership projects surrounded by such figures. Any Atiku-led administration would struggle to convince citizens that it represents a clean break from politics as usual.
Age, though not a constitutional barrier, is another factor that cannot be ignored. Leadership is as much about physical and intellectual energy as it is about experience. Nigeria is a young, restless country facing rapidly evolving challenges that demand agility, innovation, and cultural resonance with a digitally connected generation. Atiku’s age reinforces the perception of a candidate anchored in the past rather than oriented toward the future.
His educational background, while meeting minimum requirements, has never translated into a compelling intellectual or reformist brand. More troubling is the absence of a clearly articulated, transformative economic and political agenda. Beyond broad market-friendly rhetoric and privatisation themes, Atiku has not presented a bold, coherent framework capable of addressing Nigeria’s structural problems in a way that inspires confidence. In a time of crisis, vagueness is fatal.
Taken together, these factors point to an uncomfortable but necessary conclusion: Atiku Abubakar is currently unelectable as president of Nigeria. This reality raises an even more unsettling question. If Atiku, with his experience, resources, and awareness of political dynamics, continues to insist on contesting despite these glaring obstacles, one is tempted to wonder whether he is inadvertently—or deliberately—working to weaken the opposition and pave the way for the incumbent’s return. In Nigerian politics, such scenarios are not impossible. History has shown that politicians are capable of anything when personal interest intersects with elite negotiation.
Yet this does not mean Atiku has become irrelevant. On the contrary, he remains one of the most experienced politicians in Nigeria, with extensive networks across regions and institutions. His most valuable contribution at this stage is not another presidential run, but a statesmanlike intervention. Nigerians would expect him to help galvanise the opposition, unify fragmented interests, and throw his weight behind a younger, more acceptable candidate—someone with demonstrable competence, credible character, and the capacity to govern in a complex era.
Such a role would not diminish Atiku’s legacy; it would redeem it. Nigeria does not merely need experienced politicians chasing power. It needs experienced leaders who know when to step back so the nation can move forward.
Ademola Oshunniyi and Laraba Kavwam
On behalf of: UNITE NIGERIA GROUP FOR PROGRESS (UNGP)
Join BusinessDay whatsapp Channel, to stay up to date
Open In Whatsapp
