When a lawmaker struggles to speak, what does it mean for representation?

It should have been a simple task, rising to move a motion, articulating a position, and making a case before fellow lawmakers.

Instead, Adigun Adekunle, who is surprisingly a two-term member of the House of Representatives, found himself stumbling over his words in a viral video that has left many Nigerians wondering: how does a seasoned lawmaker struggle to raise a motion?

His video, which circulated on social media, shows Adigun, who represents the Ibadan North-East/South-East Federal Constituency, grappling with his words as he attempts to rescind an earlier resolution. His words come out disjointed, uncertain, and unclear, until Speaker Tajudeen Abbas intervenes to save the moment.

“Recognition coming from, the list coming from, department of eeh…; okay, I arise to move a motion as decision moved as amended. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Okay, Mr. Speaker, sorry sir, I arise, I move to motion to rescind the resolution on first motion,” he said.

For many watching, it wasn’t just a case of nerves or a bad day at the office; it raised deeper concerns about the quality of representation in Nigeria’s legislative chambers.

Adigun is not a political novice. His profile shows he was former U.S. Navy officer; he has served in the House since 2019 and has held key roles, including Deputy Chairman of the House Committee on Air Force.

His track record includes community empowerment initiatives and youth development programs. So, why did he find it so difficult to articulate a motion?

One possible explanation according to some political analyst is that Adigun may be more accustomed to working behind the scenes than engaging in the rigorous debates and legislative processes that unfold on the floor.

In Nigeria’s political system, many motions and bills are often drafted by aides and legislative staff, meaning some lawmakers may not always be directly involved in the crafting of their own proposals.

However, the optics of a struggling lawmaker matter. The National Assembly is a place where laws are shaped, policies debated, and national direction set.

Read also: How lawmakers, civil servants divert committee funds for personal use – Natasha Akpoti

A representative who cannot confidently articulate a position raises concerns about how effectively they are contributing to governance.

Nigerians did not hesitate to express to express their disappointment. The internet was not kind to Adigun. One X (formerly Twitter) user lamented:

“Stop electing or handpicking morons. In a country full of unemployed intelligent graduates, how is this dunce elected?”
Another noted: “This is probably the first time he’s speaking at the National Assembly. At the end of the day, he will carry millions and go home.”

While social media reactions can be harsh, they often reflect a deeper frustration—one rooted in the perception that many Nigerian lawmakers are in office for personal gain rather than effective representation.

Some analysts argue that a lawmaker’s effectiveness isn’t solely measured by their oratory skills, as impactful legislators often work behind the scenes, influencing policy and pushing for reforms quietly.

However, communication is a fundamental part of governance. The ability to articulate ideas, persuade colleagues, and engage the public is seen as crucial.

A lawmaker who cannot confidently express themselves on the floor of the House raises concerns about their ability to advocate effectively for their constituents.

After all, representation is about more than just securing projects for one’s constituency; it is about shaping national discourse and ensuring that every vote cast translates into an active and engaged voice in government.

A Lesson for Voters?

The incident serves as a reminder that political representation is not just about popularity, party affiliation, or even past achievements.

It is about competence, clarity, and the ability to engage meaningfully in governance, political experts have repeatedly stressed.

Nigerians often complain about their lawmakers’ performance, but elections remain the most powerful tool for change.

Moments like this should encourage voters to critically assess candidates—not just based on their promises but on their ability to deliver when it truly matters.

As for Adigun, he may recover from this moment and go on to make meaningful contributions.

But for many Nigerians, the image of a lawmaker struggling to move a simple motion will linger as a symbol of the broader issues within the country’s political leadership.