When senators and members of the House of Representatives return to the National Assembly on Tuesday after weeks away from Abuja, the official message will be one of renewed legislative business.
Bills will be read for the first and second time, committee reports will be laid, motions on national issues will be debated and oversight activities will resume.
But beneath the routine parliamentary rituals lies a political reality that is impossible to ignore: the legislative life of the 10th National Assembly is, for all practical purposes, entering its final phase.
Although the current Assembly has close to a year left before its tenure expires in June 2027, the period available for serious lawmaking is considerably shorter.
Nigeria’s electoral calendar has historically dictated the pace and priorities of Parliament more than the constitutional calendar.
Once politics gathers momentum, legislation inevitably takes a back seat.
That process is about to begin.
The National Assembly is expected to sit for only another two or three weeks before proceeding on its annual recess.
By the time lawmakers return, preparations for the January 2027 general election will be in full swing.
Political consultations, zoning negotiations, endorsements and campaigns will increasingly compete with legislative responsibilities.
For many lawmakers, particularly first-term senators seeking re-election or members eyeing governorships and other executive offices, political survival will naturally become the overriding priority.
The consequence is predictable.
Read also: NDC, Omo-Agege demand Delta Assembly’s reversal on removal of member
There will still be plenary sessions. Bills will still appear on the Order Paper. Committees will continue to schedule hearings. But Nigerians should not mistake legislative activity for legislative productivity.
If the experience of previous Assemblies is any guide, the remaining months of the 10th National Assembly will be characterised by brief periods of parliamentary work punctuated by frequent recesses, constituency engagements and electioneering.
In truth, the slowdown did not begin this year.
Since its inauguration in June 2023, the 10th Assembly has struggled to maintain long stretches of uninterrupted legislative work.
Beyond constitutionally recognised recesses, lawmakers have repeatedly suspended plenary for public holidays, national events, international parliamentary engagements, caucus meetings and party activities.
While such interruptions are not unique to this Assembly, they have contributed to a legislative calendar that often appears fragmented.
The Senate has frequently adjourned for one or two weeks at a time, only to return briefly before another scheduled break.
Committee work has similarly been affected, while oversight functions have often competed with political engagements outside Abuja.
For businesses, investors and citizens awaiting reforms requiring parliamentary approval, this stop-start rhythm has slowed legislative certainty.
The irony is that the 10th Assembly began with enormous expectations.
Following the 2023 election, many observers anticipated sweeping reforms touching electoral laws, constitutional amendments, local government autonomy, fiscal federalism, judicial reforms, policing, energy transition and economic governance.
Some of these conversations have taken place.
Far fewer have translated into transformative legislation.
Perhaps, the defining characteristic of the current Senate and National Assembly at large has been the dominance of executive-sponsored legislation.
The Tinubu administration’s priority bills have generally enjoyed swift consideration, often passing through multiple legislative stages within remarkably short periods.
The amendment restoring “Nigeria, We Hail Thee” as the national anthem remains perhaps, the clearest example.
Introduced and passed in a day, the legislation demonstrated how quickly Parliament can act when both the executive and legislative leadership are aligned.
The constitutional amendment paving the way for state police followed a similar trajectory, reflecting years of national debate finally crystallising into political consensus.
Likewise, the four tax reform bills, among the most consequential economic legislation considered by the 10th Assembly, received extensive executive backing and eventually secured legislative approval after months of negotiations with governors, business groups and regional stakeholders.
The Tax Administration Act, Nigeria Revenue Service Act, Nigeria Tax Act and Joint Revenue Board Act collectively represent perhaps the Assembly’s most significant legislative achievement because of their potential impact on revenue generation, tax administration and fiscal coordination.
Yet, even these reforms originated from the executive. That distinction matters.
A review of the Senate’s legislative record shows that while hundreds of private member bills have been introduced, only a relatively small proportion have progressed into law.
Many remain trapped at first reading and at best, committee level.
Others have yet to receive public hearings.
Several have disappeared into the legislative pipeline without clear timelines for completion.
This is hardly unusual in Nigeria’s Parliament. Private member bills have historically faced steeper hurdles than executive proposals. But the imbalance has become more pronounced during the life of the 10th Assembly, reinforcing criticisms that the legislature has increasingly functioned as a partner to the executive rather than an independent check on executive authority.
Lawmakers have over time rejected the “Rubber Stamp” characterisation, arguing that cooperation between both arms of government has reduced unnecessary confrontation and accelerated governance.
Critics insist that efficiency should never come at the expense of scrutiny.
The remaining months of this Assembly will test which of those arguments ultimately prevails.
One bill likely to receive legislative attention before the end of this Assembly is the proposed amendment to the National Youth Service Corps Act, recently approved by the Federal Executive Council.
Among other provisions, the proposal seeks to restructure aspects of the scheme, including the withdrawal of military personnel from its administration.
On the surface, administrative restructuring may appear routine.
In reality, it raises serious questions that deserve thorough parliamentary examination.
Nigeria is experiencing one of the most complex security environments in its democratic history.
Insurgency persists in the North-East, banditry continues across parts of the North-West while kidnappings remain widespread across the country.
Corps members have repeatedly become victims of insecurity during primary assignments and interstate travel.
Against that background, reducing military involvement in the NYSC framework cannot simply be treated as an administrative adjustment.
Lawmakers owe Nigerians a detailed explanation of how the proposed changes would affect the security architecture surrounding the scheme.
The Senate should invite military authorities, security experts, NYSC officials, former directors-general, state coordinators and civil society organisations to present evidence.
It should interrogate whether adequate alternatives exist, it should ask whether the timing is appropriate.
And it should be willing to amend or even reject provisions that fail to withstand scrutiny. That is what legislative due diligence demands.
Rubber-stamping executive proposals may produce legislative efficiency. It rarely produces public confidence.
The greatest challenge, however, is not the content of pending legislation.
By September, political calculations will dominate conversations within the National Assembly.
Committee meetings will increasingly compete with consultations at party headquarters. Legislative caucuses will gradually transform into campaign strategy sessions.
Attendance at plenary is likely to further decline as lawmakers shuttle between Abuja and their constituencies.
By the final months before the elections, many senators will spend more time securing delegates than debating clauses of legislation. This has happened before.
The 8th Assembly slowed considerably as the 2019 elections approached. The same pattern emerged during the final months of the 9th Assembly before the 2023 elections.
Legislative attention shifted almost entirely to politically urgent matters.
There is little evidence suggesting the 10th Assembly will be different.
To be fair, Parliament’s value cannot be measured solely by the number of laws it passes. Oversight, investigations, constituency representation and public accountability remain central constitutional responsibilities.
The Senate still has opportunities to influence governance through committee inquiries, budget implementation oversight and scrutiny of executive appointments.
But when history assesses the legislative legacy of the 10th Assembly, it is unlikely to focus on the volume of motions debated or committee meetings held.
Instead, it will ask more fundamental questions.
Did Parliament exercise sufficient independence? Did it improve executive proposals through rigorous scrutiny? Did it protect institutional checks and balances? Did it address structural problems through enduring legislation?
Those questions become even more pressing as the Assembly enters what is effectively its final legislative season.
The political campaigns ahead are inevitable. The elections will come; many lawmakers will return. Many will not.
But every bill passed in the coming months will outlive the politicians voting on it.
That alone is reason enough for Parliament to resist the temptation of speed over scrutiny.
If Nigerians should lower their expectations about the volume of legislation likely to emerge before June 2027, they should simultaneously raise their expectations about its quality.
The legislative clock may be running out. That makes every remaining sitting day more important, not less.
Join BusinessDay whatsapp Channel, to stay up to date
Open In Whatsapp
