2021 budget: Reps assures of equitable distribution of N11bn road projects

The House of Representatives has assured Nigerians that it will ensure equitable distribution of the N11 billion road projects captured in the 2021 budget proposal of the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) across the six geopolitical zones of the country.

Yusuf Gagdi (APC, Plateau) who stated this while reacting to allegations bothering on ‘hurried conclusion of the budget defence’ without taking members’ input, raised by Bamidele Salam (PDP-Osun) questioned the controversial increase in the FERMA’s envelope.

Gagdi said the issue of N11 billion allegedly inserted into the FERMA budget proposal was addressed during the budget defence, stressing that the Committee will stop at nothing to ensure the projects spread across all the six geopolitical zones if at all it
would be taken into the 2021 Appropriation Act.

According to him: “Every member believed that, yes we agreed and we have not passed the budget. There was an envelope that was given to FERMA by the Ministry of Finance through the Ministry of Works, which is the supervising ministry
of FERMA and I came to discover that the project was increased not by
the National Assembly.

“Normally the Ministry of Finance has enveloped budget because we operate envelope budget so I was aware of the fact that the envelope that was given to FERMA was not up to 30 billion, it was 20 something billion.

“And all of a sudden, I just discovered that they have submitted from the Ministry of Finance to the National Assembly over 30 something billion with an increment of about 11 billion. I raised that issue and I still stand on my feet that no how did you increase it?

“It is even the right of the budget office to submit whatever they want to submit to the National Assembly I won’t even call it padding because they have increased the money beyond the envelope of their Ministry.

“But my argument is this, where will you increase about 11 billion to one state? It is not possible. Then the committee on FERMA agreed that the purpose of the elective representative is to ensure equity and fairness to all the geopolitical entities. We now say you have brought this budget, that it is once sided. If you look at my comment very well, I tackle the fact that the budget is not balanced.

“So we must balance the budget as the people that have the right to do it in such a way that it resembles the interest of Nigerians. So my position on the 11 billion still stands that from somewhere between the Ministry of Works and Ministry of Finance, 11 billion was increased at the inter-ministerial level in the budget of FERMA. And I still stand by it.

“The predominant state that got that 11 billion that was increased it is Imo State without any fear of political contradictions but I don’t know who increased it”.

Speaking earlier after the budget defence session, Salam observed that: “There was an attempt to rush the passage of the budget and prevent those of us who had observations from doing so.

“Immediately the FERMA MD presented the budget, a colleague was raising a motion for the adoption of the budget and I raised a point of order. By parliamentary procedure, a point of order should take precedence over every other matter. In the attempt to make my point of order, I saw that the person who moved the motion was behaving like the spokesperson for FERMA.

“The observation that I made was very simple: first is the fact that in the 2021 budget proposal analysis that I have before me, out of the 420 projects proposed, the South-West zone which I am from has the least allocation which is 48, and least allocation which is about N3 billion. That is just a part of it.

Read also: Concerns over Wizchino’s slow Lagos-badagry Lot-3 road project under FERMA

“The larger part of it is that the constituency that I represent, Ede-North/Ede-South/Egbedore/Ejigbo Federal Constituency, does not have a single allocation of a project out of the 420 projects. Even the whole of the state where I come from, Osun State, which is represented by nine members in the House, does not have a single project allocated to it, out of a budget of N38.2bn proposed by
FERMA.

“I felt I should at least have a right of the audience but, unfortunately, the person who was preventing that from happening is from Plateau State and I can see in this same budget, Plateau is getting about 18 projects. Why should he not want someone who does not have anything in his own state to raise a point of order and make these observations? This is unfair, unjust and against the spirit of the Nigerian Constitution.

Asked whether FERMA’s proposal was eventually passed by the committee, Salam said: “No. Certainly not, because if the budget would be passed, we would have to vote on the motion that was purportedly moved by him. But like I said, it ended up a rowdy session.”

The National Assembly should be tired of being called a rubber stamp Assembly. We are not; we are it supposed to be. If a Ministry, department, or agency brings in a document, we should subject that document to thorough scrutiny.

“We should scrutinise it with the eye of the law, and equity, fairness, and justice. That is what the parliament should do but that is what some people are trying to resist, from what happened at this meeting. I think we should go back to look at this document and ask ourselves honestly: does this budget proposal by FERMA reflect the spirit of the Nigerian Constitution and the budget which is supposed to bring even development to all parts of the country?

“To me, the answer is no. And if the answer is no, then we should go back to the drawing board. It is still a proposal; it is a bill before the National Assembly, which is subject to being tinkered with. I am expecting that the committee, under the chairmanship of Hon. Bamisile will reconvene and address the concerns that I expressed”, the lawmaker added,

Responding to a question on the rowdy session between members of the Committee during the FERMA budget defence, Chairman, House Committee on FERMA, Femi Bamisile who dismissed the allegations bothering on unfavourable allocation of road projects to the South West and Osun State raised by Salam, explained that the Committee has resolved to re-invite the FERMA Managing Director, Nuruddeen Rafindadi on various issues raised by members.

“We needed to study the budget before we pass it. I have told them this. This is the same thing that we said last year. You cannot bring us the budget on the same day of passage. These documents are voluminous. Sometimes, they go as high as 70 or 80 pages. Do you expect a member to be reading 80 pages as they pass it?

“They will take time to do that and that was why we asked them to come back today and when they came, everybody has had time to study the document, and questions were asked. There was an issue there when one of our members was raising a point of order that his state did not have enough projects.

“I made it clear to him that if you have read the budget, you will see your state represented. I can tell you what each state has. I told the member the number of projects in his state. Unfortunately, he didn’t see it there. Even after I have made my ruling, I still allowed him to move his motion and I made it clear to him that every state was carried along.

“On Thursday, there was this notion that N11 billion was thrown into the budget. But after studying it for 72 hours, everybody, including those who moved the motion was convinced that all was well with the budget”, he stated.